There have been numerous videos taken of orbs near the sun at sunset. Some are asking if these strange anomalies are Nibiru or planet X. Two video clips of a sunset at Bald Head Island in April of 2009 have been placed on Youtube. What is different about these videos is the clarity of the view and the fact that the orb appears to set behind the clouds. View this video and decide for yourself what you are seeing.
“The 2 video clips presented were taken of a Bald Head Island sunset of either April 25 or 26, 2009. No anomaly was noticed at the time of filming, however, the sun is still quite bright at sunset. The first clip shows an orb to the left of the sun. The orb was considered to be a flare or other distortion caused by the video camera until the second clip was viewed. In the second clip the orb appears to descend behind the clouds. The clips are presented without music or other distractions and are complete and have not been edited. A search on Youtube will yield other videos of a similar experience. In particular note one by indian in the machine filmed in Montezuma Costa Rica and placed on Youtube on April 17, 2009. Another was filmed in Kissimmee Flordia and placed on Youtube on April 15, 2009. There are numerous other videos revealing similar anomalies. We are not implying that the orb is planet X or Nibiru, but it is certainly thought provoking. “
I have worked around and closely with many women over my business career. A consistent comment that many women made was that they did not like working with or for other women and most preferred working for a man. Many women I have known have also stated that women are crazy. These comments were made without me asking or soliciting the comment. With that being said, I offer a quote from one of my favorite movies.
In the movie, “As good as it gets”, Jack Nicholson, who plays a writer in the movie, is just leaving the publisher. The young female receptionist asks Nicholson a question.
Receptionist:
“How do you write women so well?”
Nicholson:
“I think of a man and I take away reason and accountability.”
I have believed for many years that a UFO was involved in the Tunguska explosion over Siberia in 1908. Many years ago I read a book, “The Fire Came By.” The book revealed that a UFO exploded over Siberia. There were multiple eyewitnesses that stated that the bright object in the sky changed course, something a meteorite cannot do. The author of the book also stated that of all locations on Earth, the remoteness of the area in Siberia that was impacted had the least impact on human populations and the planet. The author theorized that the UFO was in trouble and that a conscious decision was made by the aliens to do the least harm. I was going to write this article any way and then just now I discovered something really interesting.
Read the following and then check out ”The Fire Came By.”
“Russian Scientist: UFO Crashed Into Meteorite to Save Earth”
“Did a UFO deliberately crash into a meteor to save Earth 100 years ago? That’s what one Russian scientist is claiming.
Dr. Yuri Labvin, president of the Tunguska Spatial Phenomenon Foundation, insists that an alien spacecraft sacrificed itself to prevent a gigantic meteor from slamming into the planet above Siberia on June 30, 1908.
The result was was the Tunguska event, a massive blast estimated at 15 megatons that downed 80 million trees over nearly 100 square miles. Eyewitnesses reported a bright light and a huge shock wave, but the area was so sparsely populated no one was killed.
Most scientists think the blast was caused by a meteorite exploding several miles above the surface. But Labvin thinks quartz slabs with strange markings found at the site are remnants of an alien control panel, which fell to the ground after the UFO slammed into the giant rock.
“We don’t have any technologies that can print such kind of drawings on crystals,” Labvin told the Macedonian International News Agency. “We also found ferrum silicate that can not be produced anywhere, except in space.”"
“Scientists have discovered the oldest and most complete fossil of a human ancestor.
An incredible 95 percent complete fossil of a 47-million-year-old human ancestor dubbed Ida has been discovered and, after two years of secret study, an international team of scientists has revealed it to the world. The fossil’s remarkable state of preservation allows an unprecedented glimpse into early human evolution. Discovered in Messel Pit, Germany, it represents the moment before anthropoid primates–the group that would later evolve into humans, apes and monkeys–began to split from lemurs and other prosimian primates. This groundbreaking discovery fills in a critical gap in human and primate evolution.
A cast of the specimen will be on display in the “Extreme Mammals”
exhibition at the American Museum of Natural History in New York City.”
“Jørn Hurum from the Natural History Museum, University of Oslo, uncovered the primate through a chance encounter with a fossil dealer in Hamburg. Immediately recognizing its significance he procured it for his museum. Remarkably, it had been hidden from the world for 25 years in a private collection.
The fossil’s analysis has revealed that it is 47 million years old. Named “Ida” by the scientific team, she lived in the early Middle Eocene during a critical period in evolutionary history when, after the extinction of the dinosaurs, mammals first began to thrive on the planet. The Earth was beginning to take the shape that we recognize today, with the Himalayas forming, and early horses, bats, whales and many other fauna and flora evolving. In primate evolution, our own lineage, the anthropoids (monkeys, apes and humans), split from the branch leading to modern prosimians (lemurs, lorises and tarsiers).
Ida is the most complete primate fossil that has ever been found, at 95 percent–most previous specimens only consist of small teeth and jaw fragments. Even the next most celebrated fossil primate, 3.2-million-year-old “Lucy,” is only 40 percent complete. Sir David Attenborough has described it as “an extraordinary fossil,” and Professor Philip Gingerich of the University of Michigan, added that “it’s really a kind of Rosetta Stone” for understanding evolution. “It’s hard to think of anything else in primate evolution that’s as complete” said Dr. Holly Smith, University of Michigan.”
From the History Channel website on “The Link”, airing Monday night, May 25, 2009:
“2009 – The Link—a 47-million-year-old human ancestor—is revealed
An incredible 95 percent complete fossil of a 47-million-year-old human ancestor has been discovered and, after two years of secret study, an international team of scientists has revealed it to the world. The fossil’s remarkable state of preservation allows an unprecedented glimpse into early human evolution. Discovered in Messel Pit, Germany, it represents the moment before anthropoid primates–the group that would later evolve into humans, apes and monkeys–began to split from lemurs and other prosimian primates. This groundbreaking discovery fills in a critical gap in human and primate evolution.”
K-Pax is one of my favorite movies. It stars Kevin Spacey and Jeff Bridges. Spacey does a superb job of portraying a visitor from planet K-PAX. The movie is extremely thought provoking and certainly raises doubt about intelligent life on Earth.
I saw K-PAX at the movie theatre when it first came out circa 2002. Aside from the interesting interactions between Spacey and humans, the movie questions, in a subtle manner, accepted human activities such as marriage and doctor patient relationships as well as slaughtering animals and consuming meat. In the science area it challenges the long held assumption that travel faster than the speed of light is not possible. I have believed for many years that travel faster than the accepted speed of light is possible. Albert Einstein, though a brilliant scientist, was not God and his theories not gospel.
I read a book on VSL, Variable Speed of Light a few years ago. Do some research on this subject. It will amaze you. And if you have not seen K-PAX, get a copy and view it. It is well worth watching. Perhaps there is real intelligent life on other planets.
“My faith
is a great weight
hung on a small wire,
as doth the spider
hang her baby on a thin web,
as doth the vine,
twiggy and wooden,
hold up grapes
like eyeballs,
as many angels dance on the head of a pin.”
Anne Sexton
I am not against religion or specific religions.
I am against humans speaking for God and misrepresenting God.
The foundation of my religion:
There is a God.
I am not God.
I present to you a classic scenario in the realm of no intelligent life on Earth.
For many years I have been aware of the allegations that “theologians” in the Middle Ages and later would debate the question, “How many angels can dance on the head of a pin?” There are several variations on the wording but they all relate to debating a theoretical concept that is of no redeeming value to mankind.
Here are a few facts regarding this nonsense.
“Did medieval scholars argue over how many angels could dance on the head of a pin?”
“Let’s get a couple things straight. First, you’re misquoting the saying in question. According to unimpeachable sources, it’s not how many angels can dance on the head of a pin, it’s how many can do it on the point of a needle — which, of course, makes more sense. Second, the earliest citation I can find is from a book by Ralph Cudworth in the 17th century, which is suspiciously late in the day.
Insight on this question is provided by Isaac D’Israeli (1766-1848), the father of British prime minister Benjamin Disraeli. Isaac was an amateur scholar who published a series of books called Curiosities of Literature (the first volume appeared in 1791), which were quite popular in their day. D’Israeli lampooned the Scholastic philosophers of the late Middle Ages, notably Thomas Aquinas (c. 1224-1274), who was famous for debating metaphysical fine points.
Aquinas wrote several ponderous philosophical tomes, the most famous of which was called Summa Theologica, “summary of theology.” It contained, among other things, several dozen propositions on the nature of angels, which Thomas attempted to work out by process of pure reason. The results were pretty tortured, and to later generations of hipper-than-thou know-it-alls, they seemed a classic example of good brainpower put to nonsensical ends.”
“Koetsier and Bergmans have nosed out a few still earlier antecedents: William Chillingworth in 1648 wrote of clergymen disputing, “Whether a million of angels may not sit upon a needle’s point,” which in turn may refer to Swester Katrei, “a fourteenth-century German mystical work,” in which a character observes, “doctors declare that in heaven a thousand angels can stand on the point of a needle.”"
The question “How many angels can dance on the head of a pin?” is associated with medieval theology of the Scholastic school, the best-known representative being Saint Thomas Aquinas, the 13th-century Christian philosopher (and a Dominican monk). I’m not sure that Aquinas originated the question; maybe someone with a better grounding in Catholic thought can help us out. Nowadays the question often appears when someone is ridiculing theologians, but I believe the drift of the original discussion about angels and pinheads concerned infinity and different kinds of being. Something like this: Angels aren’t spatial, and so an infinite number of them could occupy a point.”
Organized religion created the Spanish Inquisition, the execution of Joan of Arc, the Salem Witch Trials and a multitude of other devices to “save the souls’ of the poor tortured creatures. Something as nonsensical and non helpful as debating “How many angels can dance on the head of a pin?” is no stretch at all in believability.
Do you believe there is intelligent life on Earth?
